#NODEBOX RECURSION FULL#
#NODEBOX RECURSION SOFTWARE#
#NODEBOX RECURSION CODE#
#NODEBOX RECURSION FREE#
#NODEBOX RECURSION MAC#

The user imports a GML file, such as this one from :.

GMLStenciler solves this by providing a tool in which: These strokes lack a width or thickness as a result, it is not possible to stencil raw GML tags directly. The Graffiti Markup Language specification defines a вЂњtagвЂќ as a sequence of linear вЂњstrokesвЂќ, each consisting of a sequence of timestamped (x,y) points.

#NODEBOX RECURSION SOFTWARE#

As with our Robotagger project, the GMLStenciler software presented here offers a means by which these virtual handwritten marks can be given physical form, made multiple, and economically disseminated at a variety of scales. Users of Graffiti Analysis have contributed some 17,500 tags to date. Their flagship system is the Graffiti Analysis software by Chris Sugrue and Evan Roth, which allows GML drawings to be recorded with an iPhone, uploaded to an online database, and freely shared at the # website. Lab released a suite of XML specifications and open-source tools for recording and displaying handwritten marks, which they named Graffiti Markup Language (GML).

#NODEBOX RECURSION MAC#

GMLStenciler is built in openFrameworks, an open-source C++ toolkit for creative coding it can be downloaded below (with complete source code) for Windows and Mac OSX.

#NODEBOX RECURSION FREE#

This free tool solves the problem of transforming GMLвЂ™s widthless linear strokes into adjustably-thickened stencil patterns with automatically bridged islands. Google, Siri.We announce the release of GMLStenciler, an open-source software project for converting Graffiti Markup Language (GML) drawings into vector-art stencils suitable for laser cutting.

#NODEBOX RECURSION CODE#

I mean we have systems to turn language into code all over the place. Something like that could work alongside the nodes so people could switch back and forth between the two.

But if i miss one comma in python itвЂ™s like вЂwtfвЂ™вЂ¦ i think a language that didnвЂ™t need to be so exact would cut down the stress of programmers enormously. ItвЂ™s funny because everything else on computers are so advancedвЂ¦ if my grammar is wrong, MS Word fixes it. one that just can figure out what you mean usually. What about a programming language that doesnвЂ™t have to be so exact. In a programming language like python you would have to type that exactly perfect, like 2 + 2. What do you think of something like a вЂњFuzzyвЂќ programming language. When you google вЂњWhere is the nearest StarbucksвЂќ it translates that into what you mean. Even without them it is my tool of choice.ДЄlso, what do you think about turning natural text into code?ДЄnother example is Google. Such features would not be too hard to add the lack of image nodes is a particularly bizarre omission for an image creation tool.ДЇix those three things and NodeBox would be a first-class language. I don't expect to manipulate pixels in a vector-based tool, but it sure would be nice to at least place images as references to draw against or as static elements in larger compositions.

On the top of this list is images: there is no way to display a pixel-based image in NodeBox. Some functions common to most any other language are missing in NodeBox. But it can only output still images and animations, so there is no way I can make D3-like interactive visualizations for end users using NodeBox.ДЈ. NodeBox has one of the most elegant and powerful interaction systems I've ever come across - at design time. Unlike most other functional languages NodeBox does not yet support recursion - which makes many algorithms which are easy to implement in other languages all but impossible in Nodebox.Дў. You can also extend it with custom nodes written in Python or Cloture.Д«ut there are three basic things it does need to become 'full blown' in my opinion:ДЎ. I've been using it for years both at work and at home and it can do most things that other languages do. NodeBox is also already a 'flow blown language' (almost). Like Lisp and Cloture it is a functional language, so the computation naturally moves in one direction, thereby avoiding endless spaghetti-like tangles. It is stuck simply mimicking text in a literal way.

#NODEBOX RECURSION FULL#

It is helpful in visualizing loop structures but beyond that does not really take full advantage of 2D space. Blocky simply replaces each text word with the same word inside a colored rectangle.

I think a truly visual language should fully use 2D space to more directly visualize coding structures. Blocky is 'full-blown' in the sense that it maps directly to five different established text-based languages, but that it also its weakness. Lego brick tools like Blocky can make coding seem less intimidating for kids, but I don't find them very interesting as visual programming languages.

Nodebox recursion